19/AP/6313
Erection of a 1st floor extension; and 2nd floor mansard roof extension,
with roof terrace to facilitate a change of use from office space (Use
Class B1) to residential space (Use Class C3) to create: x1 ground floor
1-bed flat; x1 1st floor 2-bed flat; and x1 2nd floor 1-bed flat.
CHANGE OF USE OF FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR OF APPROVED SCHEME
REF 17/AP/1108
The building was part of an industrial block partially removed due the
construction of near residential estate.
It has an “L” shape plan two story high and flat roof.
The first floor is setback from the main front, and it’s arranged over
two different levels.
External façade materials are bricks for the front of the building and
render for the side and rear.
The building is currently vacant. Occasionally the ground floor is used
as rehearsal hall for a faith community and first floor is used as
storage space.
The applicant/agent puts forward that the design of the scheme is the
result of a sensitive and considered approach to the site and its
context.
Amongst the benefits to be derived from the realization of the scheme
are:
• Revitalization of a neglected urban spot.
• Increase in natural surveillance on the surrounding area.
• Local employment opportunities
• Requalification of the existing building
• Balanced street elevation
• Responding to the high demand of residential unit in the area
Whilst I think the residential use of the site is acceptable, what is
shown is large windows directly onto the pavement/frontage and quite
large windows to the side tucked away and directly accessible from the
pavement area turning into that recess. There is talk about security and
“secure by design” but no evidence in what I could see.
Visually I think the additionally storey would be better with proper
brick or rendered walls both sides rather than slate clad vertical
surfaces. This may be something that was agreed as part of the
approved 17/AP/1108 office
use scheme simply carried forward.
Proposed comment — to make a neutral comment